Владислав Уткин
I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
，这一点在快连下载安装中也有详细论述
知识工程研究者，Obsidian重度用户，公众号「西郊次生林」
NYT Connections Sports Edition today: Hints and answers for February 27